In a world increasingly shaped by algorithms and artificial intelligence, how do we ensure that policy decisions are driven by evidence and rigor, not just fleeting headlines and Twitter storms? Helen Toner, the new interim Executive Director of Georgetown’s Center for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET), is at the forefront of this challenge. CSET, a leading think tank focused on the intersection of technology and security, aims to provide intellectually independent, data-driven research to inform critical policy discussions.
Toner, also a substack writer at Rising Tide and former member of Open AI’s board, recently discussed the complexities of navigating the AI policy landscape. She highlighted the tension between the increasing importance of factual analysis and the rise of polarized, often superficial, debates. So, how can organizations like CSET cut through the noise and ensure that facts still matter?
## Think Tanks in the Age of AI
Toner emphasized that despite the headline-grabbing controversies, there’s still a strong demand for detailed, evidence-based analysis within the U.S. government. Subject matter experts are actively seeking rigorous research to inform their decisions, suggesting that facts continue to play a crucial role behind the scenes. The success of CSET, in part, lies in its unique data science team which powers much of their insightful analysis. Toner hopes to build on CSET’s foundations to support well-reasoned technology policy for years to come.
## From Chaos to Consensus: A Glimmer of Hope?
Toner points to recent developments in AI legislation as a potential turning point. Despite initial turmoil surrounding California’s SB 1047 bill, a governor’s panel was convened, a report was published, recommendations were adopted, and a less controversial bill was passed. She also noted the EU Code of Practice, overcoming obstacles to achieve passage. These examples suggest that even in a highly charged environment, constructive dialogue and evidence-based policymaking are still possible.
Ultimately, navigating the AI policy landscape requires a multi-faceted approach. It’s about delivering rigorous research, engaging with policymakers at all levels, and fostering a culture of informed debate. While the challenges are significant, Toner’s insights offer a roadmap for ensuring that facts continue to guide critical decisions in the age of AI.
